<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[T-QT-C6 connectivity connector.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">What was a reason to make a hardwired connector for UART instead of using the standard and flexible configurable connectivity (UART/I2C/GPIO)?</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.community.lilygo.cc/topic/1064/t-qt-c6-connectivity-connector</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 20:46:23 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.community.lilygo.cc/topic/1064.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 07:19:24 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to T-QT-C6 connectivity connector. on Tue, 09 Jul 2024 08:55:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">In addition:</p>
<p dir="auto">Also, why the external pins are not vertically organized in the 2 rows for easy connection, for instance I2C pins such as IO22, IO21, 3.3V, GND (4pins header) which it will allow to use a standard 4pins dupont header to Grove cable.</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.community.lilygo.cc/post/1935</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.community.lilygo.cc/post/1935</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[rkiss]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 08:55:51 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>